Tech Word

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

A fee by any other name

Posted on 09:59 by Unknown
Rogers announced they're dropping the hated $6.95 cellphone system access fee. They're replacing it with a "regulatory recovery fee" ranging from $2.46 to $3.46. They're also raising their rates by $5. The net effect is that rates will increase between $.51 and $1.51. Rogers is also adding three non-optional calling features, in vain effort to minimize the wrath that will surely ensue. Talk about rate rage.

This is a scheme so brilliant it could only have been developed by a marketer in collusion with an accountant. To announce a lowering of fees when it is actually a fee increase is the finest example of double-speak.

It actually goes further than that. Why even list any separate fee? It's the same kind of deception and nonsense we see in car prices (with fees for freight and inspection) and airline tickets (with fees for security, landing, taking off, passenger facility, airport use, and god knows what else.)

The bottom line is that there should be only one bottom line. Only one number should be given for any price. (Well, one pre-tax number, anyway.)

Here's how I (or any sane tech writer) would have documented this change:

We are increasing our rates by $.51 to $1.51. To somewhat offset this, we'll now include three new calling features that regularly cost $11. As an additional goodwill gesture, we'll give you 100 free airtime minutes.

It's honest, it's clear and it respects the user; something all documentation should do.
Read More
Posted in business, news | No comments

Monday, 14 September 2009

Geek is the new chic

Posted on 13:56 by Unknown
Check out this actual ad copy from a Best Buy flyer:
"We love love reading installation manuals so you don't have to. Connecting components, mounting TVs, dressing wires-Geek Squad is here to do all the work for you"
Ah - the geek squad - my true family. I mean, who doesn't love "connecting components, mounting TVS, and dressing wires. (What the heck is "dressing wires"? Do wires have pants?) In any case, we do love reading install guides. In fact, many of us got into this profession because we love reading guides so much, that when we read a poorly written one, we knew we could do better.

At least that's one of the geeky reasons I became I tech writer - what's your reason?
Read More
Posted in business, technology | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

Categories

  • art
  • autism
  • bad communication
  • business
  • career
  • cloud computing
  • computers
  • creativity
  • entertainment
  • finance
  • food
  • Google
  • history
  • interviewing
  • math
  • media
  • medicine
  • misc.
  • music
  • nature
  • news
  • philosophy
  • politics
  • quantum theory
  • religion
  • resume
  • resumes
  • science
  • security
  • simplicity
  • sport
  • technology
  • usability

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (9)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2011 (36)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (47)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2009 (36)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ▼  September (2)
      • A fee by any other name
      • Geek is the new chic
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2008 (24)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (10)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2005 (10)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2004 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2002 (3)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile